Free to Be or Not to Be
on February 6, 2009
Linsay Rousseau Burnett/Special to Oakland North
Regardless of your opinion of President Barack Obama’s inaugural address, there was one seemingly benign statement that made inaugural history: “We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus and … non-believers.” While this line was a much-needed acknowledgement of the religious diversity in this country, it contained one final word that has been absent from most political discourse.
As an atheist, I was never more aware of the influence of government-sponsored religion than when I was in the U.S. Army. Chaplains are fixtures in the military and my disdain for their religious presence solidified when I attended a mandatory suicide awareness briefing while stationed in Iraq and a chaplain stated that those considering suicide needed to develop a stronger relationship with Jesus and pray more. Because I was merely an enlisted specialist, there was no way for me to express my concerns and be critical of the chaplain, who was a high-ranking officer. I was not alone in my frustrations. Some soldiers objected because they were not Christians, but more common were those who, faithful or not, took offense to these religious leaders, who were rarely in harm’s way, talking to them about war, death and morality. So I did the only thing I could, stay quiet. During my Army oath of enlistment I omitted the phrase, “so help me god.” At ramp ceremonies and funerals I avoided participating in prayers because I was the one taking pictures. All other times, when heads were bowed I held my chin up. My one religious success was forcing the drill sergeants to designate a “meditation” room at basic training for those of us who didn’t attend church and were tired of always getting stuck cleaning the barracks in their absence.
I have always been fascinated by religion and spirituality. While I was raised with a foundation in the Episcopal Church, my parents’ careers in the National Park Service resulted in a strong Native American cultural influence in our house. They have always been open minded and progressive when it comes to religion, seeing it as an opportunity for community rather than dogma. There was a time when I was actively involved in church, singing in the choir, a member of the youth group and serving as an acolyte during Sunday services. Ironically, it was my involvement in religious activities that began to push me away from the church. My descent from grace began when I was 16 years old. I was on a youth group trip near Denver, Colorado, working at a summer camp for underprivileged inner city children. Standing under the basketball hoop one sunny day, a camp counselor told the children (ages 6-12) that they, and their families, would go to hell if they did not accept Jesus Christ as their savior. That was my breaking point. I knew I could no longer be a part of this.
I continued to go to church with my parents, but only to sing. Later, as an undergraduate studying sociology and cultural anthropology at the College of William and Mary, I became fascinated by the evolution of spirituality and religion, and spent time living with and studying indigenous peoples in Central and South America. I flirted with a wide range of spiritual practices — paganism, Buddhism, Baha’ism — but nothing felt comfortable. I became increasingly critical of the inherently divisive nature of organized religion, in any form. I no longer saw a need to believe in a higher power. The universe is something tangible and it is the duty of humanity to protect it and each other. We do not need a god to tell us how to act.
While I have a respect for the cultural significance of religion, I am strongly critical of a religious presence in the political affairs of any country. If the United States prides itself on being a bastion of freedom and democracy, why are sessions of Congress opened with a prayer? Any official prayer, regardless of the content or the orator, is inherently discriminating against those who often identify as “freethinking secularists.” The label is simple — it means beliefs should be formed on the basis of reason and logic and should not be influenced by authority, tradition, or any other dogma, and that governmental practices or institutions should exist separately from religion and religious beliefs.
The debate over whether the United States was founded on Christian principles has been heating up for several decades as issues such as sexual education classes in public schools, gay marriage, and abortion emerged into the political stage. If Christianity was in fact the underpinning of our society’s birth, then why were the Founding Fathers so vocally mistrustful of religious intrusion into government? In 1813, Thomas Jefferson wrote, “Religion is a subject on which I have ever been most scrupulously reserved. I have considered it as a matter between every man and his Maker, in which no other, and far less the public, had a right to intermeddle.” In fact, it was not until 1956 that “In God We Trust” became the national motto, a byproduct of Cold War communist hysteria.
But meddle the public did. According to a 2006 study published by the American Sociological Association, “Atheists are America’s most distrusted minority.” Accounting for roughly three percent of the U.S. population, Americans rate them below Muslims, recent immigrants, gays and lesbians, and other minority groups in “sharing their vision of American society.”
The inclusion of religious ideas and activities in government, no matter how innocuous they may seem, sends a message that those “lacking” faith cannot be just and moral leaders. I believe that the opposite is true. The war in Iraq is just the latest in a long line of examples of how the clashing of religious dogmas (though not operating in a vacuum) can lead to distrust, violence and even war. Would it not be proper to surmise that by removing religion from government, we would be removing at least one catalyst for conflict?
So while the inaugural ceremony was steeped in prayer and religious references, the mere fact that President Obama acknowledged the existence of this small minority of non-believers is a promising step forward in establishing true freedom and equality in this country – the freedom to be or not to be. As the first African American president, his election demonstrates that this country can move past discrimination and prejudice. His speech subtly asserted that it is the role of the government to recognize and protect all minority populations. This gives faith to the faithless that one day, our non-beliefs will no longer be a litmus test for elected office and we will not have to awkwardly look at the ground during an opening prayer.
56 Comments
Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Oakland North
Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to: oaklandnorthstaff@gmail.com.
HI looks very interesting! bookmarked your blog. john brightman
Fantastic information,This is the first time i heard about this. keep it up this good works.
Thanks,
Micheal
I listened whole speech and i would sat that he was to include the religion lines in the speech coz we have settled some religious antagonism due to our foreign policy . and it feels batter that we are ready to make some change…
I also hope that Mr. Obama will come with some good foreign policy especially in south west asia due to we are also facing terrorism problems …
lemon law usa
Hi I really like your website very informative I will be coming back to check it out again
all the best
yours
acrobats circus performers
thanks for you to share . it is so useful for us
Fantastic information,This is the first time i heard about this. keep it up this good works.
thanks your post
jammer
sinyal kesici
Hi,
I found your blog on google and read a few of your other posts. I just added you to my Google News Reader. Keep up the good work. Look forward to reading more from you in the future.
Regards,
Jane
i like this site . thank you to Admin for sharing everything with us.
Thanks for the post, it’s very inspiring…
Travel notes
it better to be free…
good post, thank 4 sharing. Visit me please..
mengembalikan jati diri bangsa
a new parenting blog for parent discussions chats and natters http://parentinggossip.blogspot.com/ get it all out
more information on your site, i want to know about this admin site.
my name shevy,,, nice to meet u..
Well written,full of inspiration.
Interesting and inspiring, I like this information, Thanks for Sharing
Regard,
John Travely
Hi, nice info. I have been wondering about this your post,so thanks for this posting. I will certainly be coming back to your blog. Keep up your good work.
Business 2010
Thanks for the post, its very inspiring, I will be coming back again, your theme is also great.
Times are changing and in England there is more of an awareness of Atheism – in fact there’s a new movie coming out about Charles Darwin. Sadly its not going to be released in America
Sincere post.I will come back to your blog frequently!
What a story…
The inclusion of religious ideas and activities in government, no matter how innocuous they may seem, sends a message that those “lacking” faith cannot be just and moral leaders. I believe that the opposite is true. The war in Iraq is just the latest in a long line of examples of how the clashing of religious dogmas (though not operating in a vacuum) can lead to distrust, violence and even war. Would it not be proper to surmise that by removing religion from government, we would be removing at least one catalyst for conflict? how true..
I m fully agree with your point good step taken by you dear..
Good Sharing, keep posting.
[…] to Be or Not to Be 21 October 2009 Published on Oakland North 6 February […]
[…] to Be or Not to Be 6 February 2009 Published on Oakland North 6 February […]
Thank you for sharing. Great!
it is really interesting.
thanks for sharing…
I like the title
Hello, I am Buyung the owner of Blog Indonesian Ads Directory , nice to meet you. You have a very nice blog and helpfull.Don’t forget to visit and give your comments to my blog.Okay !!!
Excellent post, Thanks for your guide, I’ve gained a lot of useful information now!
Looks great.
I think certain things that happen in this world are I suppose in a way linked with God, but other then that the world does not rely on religion to survive. Thanks for your post anyway found it really informative.
There are many diverse people who follow different religions in the same country I don’t think it would be fair to say that One country can only have one religion. People should have the freedom of choice and can choose to become whatever they want to be. Because maybe at different stages of their lives they may want to follow a different religion
Great article the cultural significance of religion is an interesting point and makes for further debate.
Religion should be separated from matters of state and the prevailing political view, as your post points out, otherwise we are not really free.
I rear your article, this is a excellent. I have get lot of information, i share with my experience.
Dog Life Jacket
THNK YOU
nice blog you have, and nice topic to talk about. in my mind religion is the way to make a better life for people.
Thanks for sharing this great article.
i Feel this is very nice blog post it really taught all of us about our religian and spirituality,i appreciate these lines in the post “This gives faith to the faithless that one day, our non-beliefs will no longer be a litmus test for elected office and we will not have to awkwardly look at the ground during an opening prayer.”
Combo clearance
Bed in a bags
I just would like to thanks for the blog. Like it. Thanks You have the face of a saint…a Saint-Bernard!
Thank you for sharing. Great!
I just would like to thanks for the blog. Like it.
beautiful and interesting articles
beautiful and interesting articles…
great blog. hope for the future of this blog is getting good with article more useful and good. ok thanks and god bless you
it’s a great info, maybe i’ll trackback in my site http://webinfo.co.tv latter,thanks.
Hayadministrator I like with ur news . May i save this posting for my school test ? thank you admin
thanks for all information
Thank you all… very good.. informations I love all