Skip to content

Quan’s mayoral campaign starts early, picks up endorsement

on December 19, 2009

It’s almost Christmas. It’s not even an election year. But Oakland City Councilwoman Jean Quan is already on the campaign trail. Some time next year, she’ll be showing up at your door in North Oakland to ask for your vote for mayor.

“I love campaigning, because I will know more than anyone about the city of Oakland when I’m done,” Quan told a group of supporters at a December 16 fundraiser at the Montclair Women’s Club. “I’ve talked to so many people. Every door is a different experience.”

Quan was elected to the Oakland School Board in 1990 and City Council in 2002 after extensive door-to-door campaigning in a district that includes Montclair, Laurel and Dimond. She has talked about following the Obama campaign’s neighborhood organizing strategy for her mayoral run, and said one of her goals is to knock on every door in North Oakland.

“Organizing beats money,” she said. “It’s not sexy, it’s hard day-by-day organizing. But surveys show we have a chance to be on top, and there’s a clear movement for a different kind of mayor in Oakland.”

The mayoral election is still 11 months away, but Quan received an early vote of confidence from Sandré Swanson, one of Oakland’s State Assembly representatives.

“I appreciate being able to come forward and support Jean at this very important time,” Swanson told Quan’s supporters at the Montclair Women’s Association. “I think Jean’s going to be Oakland’s next mayor because she follows up on issues. She cares about this town and is willing to work for it.”

City Councilwoman Jean Quan (left) picked up an endorsement from Assemblyman Sandre Swanson in her 2010 run for mayor

City Councilwoman Jean Quan (left) picked up an endorsement from Assemblyman Sandre Swanson in her 2010 run for mayor

Swanson cited his work with Quan on returning Oakland schools to local control earlier this year as one of Quan’s tangible accomplishments on City Council.

“Against great odds in Sacramento, we kept pounding on the issue, embarrassing the state at every turn,” he said. “We showed them that the people of the city of Oakland feel very passionately about their children and wanted to make sure decisions were made locally.”

Quan also worked with Swanson on what he described as California’s “landmark legislation” protecting minors from sexual exploitation. He said the bill helps authorities halt teenage prostitution on Oakland’s San Pablo Avenue and International Avenue, an issue he said few politicians were willing to acknowledge, let alone confront.

Quan’s supporters cited her knowledge of Oakland city government as one of her main qualifications for mayor. She has served as chair of the City Council Finance Committee, which has had to make difficult decisions in cutting close to $100 million from the 2009 city budget, with a projected $25 million of budgets cuts still to come in 2010.

“She’s the one who knows the city of Oakland inside and out,” said Claudia Falconer, president of the Montclair Village Association. “It’s a troubled time, and cities across the country are having fiscal problems. Jean knows the Finance Department of the City of Oakland better than anyone else.”

City Council has not traditionally been a springboard for the Oakland mayor’s office, however. The last time an incumbent City Council member was elected mayor was in 1960. The three City Council Members who ran for mayor most recently—Ignacio de la Fuente, Nancy Nadel and Wilson Riles Jr.—lost to Ron Dellums and Jerry Brown, politicians with fundraising advantages from higher state and national recognition.

Dellums has not announced whether he intends to run for a second term in 2010. He would face challenges from Quan and Don Perata, the former State Senate president who wants to return to his native Alameda County to run Oakland’s City Hall. Perata, who rattled political sabers with Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger during State Capitol budget battles, is a well-known political figure throughout California and is expected to have an advantage in raising money.

Swanson joked that his colleagues—and Perata’s former colleagues—in the State legislature in Sacramento ask him about the Oakland mayoral race “all the time.” He called Perata a political “Goliath,” but said that Quan’s persistence and attention to detail will make her very competitive. He told Quan he’ll be walking precincts with her closer to the election.

“This campaign will be won in the neighborhoods, and there’s no one who campaigns better in the neighborhoods than Jean,” he said. “People will vote for substance and for someone who pays attention to detail.”

There’s a new wrinkle to the mayoral race next year. In 2006, 69 percent of Oakland voters approved instant runoff voting, which has since survived various legal challenges. With instant runoff voting, Oakland voters will rank their choices for mayor rather than voting for one person. This eliminates the need for party primaries in the spring, when city elections in the heavily Democratic Oakland have usually been won and lost.

Quan hopes this new system, which grants an additional five months of campaign time, will help her raise money and her public profile for a run against Perata and possibly Dellums. She insists that on-the-ground knowledge of Oakland neighborhoods and city government experience are essential prerequisites for the city’s next mayor.

“Anybody can promise you that they can end crime or improve schools,” Quan said, “But if they don’t do it together by organizing the neighborhoods block by block, they’re lying to you. We’ve had a series of people [in Oakland] who were supposed to come in and fix things for us, but real change happens when people are involved.”


  1. oaklandier on December 19, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    If it’s a question of Quan, Dellums, and Perata, then I know how I’ll be voting. Q over them, to be sure.

    I don’t know, though. I’d like to see someone else step in, someone that hasn’t been tainted by years of Oakland City mismanagement. . .

  2. len raphael on December 20, 2009 at 9:50 am

    depressing that the choice we’ll get at the polls is between a termed out pol who was an outside consultant selling the Raiders deal to the county 10 years ago (the deal that costs Oakland 10Mill $ per year); or council member who years ago led the school board in adopting the infamous Ebonics and went as a council finance leader approving city employee compensation and retirement increases and Kids First measures that would have led to huge deficits even if the real estate bubble had never ended.

    When it comes to crime reduction, there’s Perata with his gun buyback program a couple of years ago when he got first in line and got his cash for his guns, but hundreds of other people behind him get vouchers (many from out of state bringing rusted old firearms).

    Or take Quan with her statement of a couple of years ago in response to a crime increase that residents here should accept the reality that Oakland isn’t Orinda.

    Oakland deserves better.

    -len raphael

  3. […] someone explain to me why being the Chair of the City Council’s Finance Committee is being touted by Oakland mayoral candidate Jean Quan’s supporters as an argument in her favor, rather than an argument against her? Quan’s supporters cited her knowledge of Oakland city […]

  4. ralph on December 22, 2009 at 4:19 pm

    To be fair, since I have been in Oakland, only IDLF has demonstrated the fiscal leadership necessary to run this city. Too many of council members believe that more money is always the answer – Measure OO anyone. You simply can not run a city if you support positions that allows millions in unfunded mandates to be given to programs that have no demonstrated success.

  5. Marty Price on December 30, 2009 at 4:54 pm

    As a lifeong resident who has watched politicians turn this city into a cash cow for their friends, I am pleased to see that Quan is running. Dellums probably will not run in spite of the fact that he has made strides cleaning up the mess that Brown left, to wit, the massive give away to Forrest City,land plus 65 million, the Fox Oakland another 40million;although some see that as improvement, no cops hired for four years and a rising crime rate. Hey crime is going down, we got a new chief, and the A’s have been confronted an invited in as opposed to chased away(Brown).
    Quan is right this is not Orinda, and if you want it to be move there. As for IDLF, I do not agree with the writer who said he demonstrates fiscal responsibility. His finger prints are all over the Raider deal, his former aide Carlos Plazola parlayed his inside knowledge into getting a piece of the action in the attempt to build along the estuary on Embarcadero, and IDLF has been a part of everyone of Brown’s give aways. Jean is a part of the Ebonics debate, but it was an overblown one. Realistically blacks that are from the impoverished part of our community do bring different speaking styles to the classroom. What the board simply meant is that these kids need to be taught like they were second language learners, which is just good practice.Kids First was voted on by the city and written and submitted by Sheila Jordan when she was on the council. As legislation it was hailed throughout the state. As for Perata I am wondering what is left in the city to give away to one of his many benefactors. Does Ron Cowan have another project that he wants to do? Is it Oak Knoll?He has a major finger in the school takeover whereby the state doubled the debt they assumed and turned Oakland into a modern educational eugenics lab. Nope I am for Quan, she does not owe anyone and loves the town and all its grit and character, and Orinda has no grit and little character!

Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Photo by Basil D Soufi
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to:

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top