Skip to content

Oakland police officers, community leaders warn against laying off cops

on June 21, 2010

On Monday morning, Oakland police officers and community leaders gathered at the site of a recent murder in West Oakland to warn of what could follow if Oakland’s police force is drastically cut to help close the city’s $31.5 million budget gap. “This is a dangerous city,” Dominique Arotzarena, president of the Oakland Police Officer’s Association, told a small group composed mostly of journalists. Laying off one quarter of the police staff, he said, “sends the wrong message.”

Arotzarena spoke from a thin wooden podium set up in a parking lot at the corner of 8th Street and Adeline Street in West Oakland, across from the corner store where James Lee Johnson was shot and killed on June 6. Two suspected gang members were later arrested and charged with the murder.

Gwendolyn Randle, the mother of Johnson’s son, spoke at the press conference, crediting the police and neighbors for nabbing Johnson’s suspected killers. “We are so grateful for that. So I truly think that it would be wrong to lay off these officers,” Randle said.

The Oakland City Council will consider cutting 200 police jobs as it rushes to trim $31.5 million from the city’s general fund before the June 30th deadline to submit next year’s budget. At the press conference, church leaders, community members, and current and former officers spoke against the plan.

“Crime is the number one concern of all Oakland residents,” said Greg McConnell, president of the Jobs and Housing Coalition, a non-profit business group that has polled extensively on the issue. “We strongly encourage that this does not occur.”

Burney Matthews, a retired Oakland police officer and former chief of police for the city of Alameda, said his concern was for the safety of officers on the beat. “They need adequate cover, backup and resources to do the job right and keep themselves safe.”

Several church leaders worried that the police wouldn’t be able to contend with another budget fallout, though this one at the state level—the potential early release of thousands of prisoners across California over the next few years. “With no jobs, no skills, no opportunities for them to infiltrate into mainstream society, there’s no way police can handle that,” said Bishop Bob Jackson of Acts Full Gospel Church of God in Christ.

After the conference, Randle, who lives in East Oakland, said Johnson used to call her to check on the safety of their son, James (nicknamed “Sug,” short for “Sugar”), when gunfights broke out in his West Oakland neighborhood. “He’d call me and say ‘Is Sug there? Ok, ‘cause they’re down here shooting and I wanted to make sure he’s not outside,'” Randle said.

Oakland’s violent crime rate has dropped in recent years, but the city remains one of the nation’s most violent. Measure Y, passed by voters in 2004, requires the city to maintain 739 officers on staff in order to get nearly $20 million in funding for violence prevention programs, additional police and fire services. The city’s continued financial crisis has made maintaining that level difficult, even though layoffs would mean losing the $20 million from Measure Y.

At an Oakland City Council meeting last week, several council members took aim at the pension program for police officers and fire personnel, which is funded entirely by the city, suggesting that officers contribute more to their retirement funds. Other city employees are required to contribute 9 percent of their paychecks to their funds.

Asked at the press conference if members of the police officer’s union would consider contributing to their pensions, Arotzarena said it was still in negotiations with the city, but he reminded the crowd that the officers had made concessions in last year’s budget negotiations in order to save the city $34.2 million over the next three and a half years. Among the concessions, officers agreed to forego a 4 percent raise, give up six holidays for three years, and start paying 2 percent into their pension funds when the union’s existing contract is up in 2013.

At the conference, Arotzarena tried to steer the discussion away from pensions. “Anything can be subject to negotiation,” he said, “but I need guarantees of public safety, and that means no layoffs of police officers.”

The city council will begin to debate options for balancing the budget at a special meeting on Thursday evening, June 24. If the council does decide to eliminate police jobs, Collin Wong, a former Oakland police officer who now owns a private security company, said his firm may be able to hire some laid-off cops. “We never thought we’d be in a position to backstop the POA [Police Officer’s Association],” he said after the press conference, shaking his head.

The officers’ union is hosting a job fair on Tuesday, June 22, to connect potential employers to officers threatened with layoffs.

Lead image: Gwendolyn Randle, whose son’s father was recently shot and killed across the street, speaks in favor of preserving police jobs. Behind her at the podium are Dominique Arotzarena, president of the Oakland Police Officer’s Association (center), and Pastor Michael Pasley from the Ephesian Baptist Church (left).

Want to get updates on the latest news from Oakland North? Join us on Facebook.

3 Comments

  1. OaktownRepublic on June 22, 2010 at 9:56 am

    I’ve been reading these same stories for over four years. It defies belief.

    And thanks to some stupid accounting by the Chair of the City’s Budget Committee (e.g. the 35% pension increase, backdated), we’ll be reading it again next year, but the hole will be twice the size.



  2. j.a. stofle on June 22, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    shame on you city council! keep your officers keep your city safe.you are going against the will of the people.measure k remember?



  3. greg on July 10, 2010 at 12:13 pm

    Let me tell you what will be next.
    Step #1. Businesses moving from Oakland or just closing the doors, which means less revenue for the city
    Step #2. Higher taxes, higher insurance rates and more businesses and property owners moving out. So, less and less money collected by Delusional Exotic Leadership of the city, which increases their pays and benefits every day.
    Step #3. City runs out of people’s money and “community” will start hunting “community leaders and organizers” who will be guarded by the last a few dozens of officers. Future is Great as collupsing Soviet Union or Cuba or venesuela.



Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Photo by Basil D Soufi
logo
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to: oaklandnorthstaff@gmail.com.

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top