As parking enforcement transfers to OPD oversight, workers will have to pass new background checks

As the city council makes tough decisions about budget cuts, the parking enforcement unit may soon be a part of the OPD.  This transfer may mean tougher background checks for parking enforcement technicians.  Archived photo by Megan Molteni.

As the city council makes tough decisions about budget cuts, the parking enforcement unit may soon be a part of the OPD. This transfer may mean tougher background checks for parking enforcement technicians. Archived photo by Megan Molteni.

As budget cuts loom, city officials are preparing to transfer Oakland’s parking enforcement unit to the Oakland Police Department.  The transfer is intended to allow the parking enforcement staff to be trained to write tickets and accident reports, as well as become a part of OPD’s booting program—placing wheel clamps on cars that have several unpaid parking citations.  But the move may create problems for some parking enforcement technicians, critics say, because they will now have to pass a more intensive background check than the one required for their initial hire.

The proposed changes to the parking enforcement unit would require current parking enforcers to undergo a background check, which includes checking their fingerprints and driver’s licenses.

“If they have access to the police department, and if they have access to any information, they have to have a background check,” said Oakland Police Chief Howard Jordan as he addressed the city council during last week’s meeting.  “The driver’s license part is already done, but the criminal check for any kind of prohibitive information will have to be completed.”

But Councilwoman Rebecca Kaplan says requiring long-term workers, who already have jobs as parking technicians, to undergo a more in-depth background check, will create problems. “I don’t think it will be acceptable to get rid of long-term people based on a background check that was never a requirement before,” Kaplan said. “It’s unprofessional and fundamentally unfair to tell someone who has done everything right to secure a career that he or she has to go and do something else—something different—than what we’ve already told them to do.”

Kaplan said that she is concerned that the new requirement may cause some people to lose their jobs. “We have existing workers who may be told they’re going to be out of a job, based on a new background check,” Kaplan said.  “That doesn’t seem right.”

The changes, which are a part of the city’s new budget plans, would transfer the parking enforcement unit, which is currently a part of the Finance and Management Agency, to the Oakland Police Department. It would eliminate one job, the Parking Management position, but add an administrative service manager.  These changes are supposed to save the city over $74,000 a year.

Under the transfer, the OPD will oversee the administrative service manager, parking enforcement supervisors and parking enforcement technicians.  The city’s Public Works Agency will supervise parking meter repair workers and parking garages.  Oakland’s Finance and Management Agency will oversee the parking meter collector supervisor and parking meter collectors.

While it might seem like having the Public Works Agency, rather than the OPD, oversee the parking enforcement technicians would be an easy fix to the background check issue, City Administrator Deanna Santana says that would mean spending more money.

“We were looking at way to eliminate simple service overhead,” said Santana.  “Public Works is more expensive. Transferring the positions to OPD allowed for us to save on service central overhead costs.”

Public Works would charge the city a 23 percent overhead rate for supervising the parking enforcement technicians, said Sabrina Landreth, the budget director for the city administrator’s office.  According to Santana, the city will save a little more than $1 million in central service overhead costs by having the OPD, rather than the Public Works Agency, oversee them.  “That drove the decision,” said Santana.

In addition to the new changes, the parking division will be trying other ways to increase revenue.  On March 1, the parking division will start a pay-by-phone program, which would allow people to use their cellphones to pay for parking at meters. The division is also considering installing debit/credit meters throughout Oakland and starting a program through which cars with three or more citations would be stickered to show that they may be subject to being booted. These plans are still being reviewed.

For now, the city is trying to smooth the transition as parking enforcement prepares to move to OPD.  Santana said she is aware of the potential conflict that may result now that some city employees will have to pass a new background check to keep their jobs. “I will bring back an info memo on how the dust settles with moving this to police,” she promised the council last week.

Kaplan thinks city officials should careful that they don’t end up accidentally disqualifying workers whom they want to keep on the job. “We have to make sure we don’t lose people we’re trying not to lose,” Kaplan said.

 

4 Comments

  1. Cynthia Gorney

    Here’s one thing this transfer might help: sensible coordination! When my car was stolen in Oakland a few years ago, the robbers collected parking tickets in 4 cities. Every city besides Oakland ran a quick check, saw the date of my stolen car police report & the date the car was found, and cleared the tickets for me. But Oakland insisted I go to the pox department in person for copies of the report, then take that to the ticket office in another building–all during work day, of course–and wait in long line. Wrote angry letter to chief about this (pre Batts). No response. Aaargh!

  2. I believe Kaplan is wrong, this is 100% fair and square – I am shocked they have not had to pass background checks! -not only do the enforcers have a role in enforcing the law but it is entirely prudent to know for certain that they are not criminals. Plus, for no extra charge, they could be trained to be ‘eyes and ears’for public safety, be certified in CPR and basic response to incidents, and other functions that will further reduce crime, increase public safety and save more $$. Citizens may then look to this traveling city worker with more respect, rather than fear and disdain for their unfair acts against us. This is a non brainer. Not to mention, their REAL duty is to ensure orderly flow of traffic and parking NOT to be a ‘hidden tax’ enforcing parking like ‘junk yard dogs’.

  3. UK car park management- A leading car parking enforcement service provider company offers warden ticketing, self ticketing and ANPR ticketing facility for their customers to offer better parking environment.

  4. Parking management often proves tricky. There needs to be a balance struck between ensuring that rules are enforced (to guarantee the safety of pedestrians and drivers alike) with “positive prevention” to educate road users about the issue; while being sensitive to their situation. It can be a tough balancing act at times, especially when taking into account the needs of local residents. Effective parking management incoroprates all of these.

    Best wishes, Alex.

Post a comment

Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content. For concerns about comments posted to this site, please contact us at staff@oaklandnorth.net.

Your email is never shared. Required fields are marked *

Connect with Facebook

*
*