Skip to content

You Tell Us: Time to get on board with BRT for Oakland

on July 17, 2012

On Tuesday, Oakland is poised to make history with AC Transit. Specifically, International Boulevard is in a position to gain over $150 million of investment, bring in over 300 new, full-time jobs, improve safety from traffic and crime, receive attractive new streetscape (including street re-paving from curb to curb) and become a healthier corridor overall. AC Transit’s proposed “Bus Rapid Transit” (BRT) project will go before the Oakland City Council this Tuesday, and we urge them to vote in support.

AC Transit has been working on improving transit along the heavily used corridor for more than 10 years. The final proposal before the council is a light-rail system on wheels–stopping at platform stations with level, all-door boarding, and running in dedicated lanes that will keep transit running out of traffic and arriving reliably every 5 minutes. New stations will be spaced closer together than the distance between “rapid” bus stops today, but will be spaced a bit further apart from where the slower local route stops. If other cities’ Bus Rapid Transit projects are any indication of what will happen, Oakland will see more transit service for less cost, a growth in ridership, and new infrastructure that will improve current conditions for everyone. Just the potential for BRT has already helped win over $1.25 million for the City of Oakland to facilitate and implement better planning and policies along the corridor.

Of course BRT will have its share of trade-offs. Some parking in certain places along the corridor will be removed to accommodate BRT stations and turning lanes for cars, and traffic will be slowed a bit for cars during the peak hours. However, what may add a few minutes or so to a car trip along the entire corridor will save bus riders 20 minutes. International Boulevard will become a safer place to do business, walk, ride a bike, and even drive a car. Currently, speeding, biking, and pedestrian conditions along International Boulevard are dangerous and deplorable, making the corridor somewhere to pass through as opposed to being a place to go to. Finally, regarding concerns for small businesses, AC Transit has expressed a commitment to work with them as the project unfolds. Unlike a more intense rail project, however, construction impacts for BRT are not going to be much greater than the sorely needed re-paving of the street.

Upon analysis, it’s clear that the benefits outweigh the costs of BRT. The project would be a game-changer for International Boulevard bringing world-class transit to Oakland, and would enable AC Transit and the City to “do more with less.” Looking ahead towards reduced tax revenues despite certain growth, Oakland would be wise not to miss this bus.

Olis Simmons, Executive Director and CEO, Youth Uprising

Jonathan Bair, President, Walk Oakland Bike Oakland

Andy Kelley, President, East Bay Young Democrats

Joel Ramos, Community Planner, TransForm


You Tell Us is Oakland North’s community Op-Ed page, featuring opinion pieces submitted by readers on Oakland-related topics. Have something to say? Send essays of 500-1,000 words to We’d love to hear from you!

All essays reflect the opinions of their authors, and not of the Oakland North staff or the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism. Oakland North reserves the right to edit submissions for length, clarity and spelling/grammar. Oakland North does not pay for the the publication of opinion pieces. You Tell Us submissions must be written in civil and non-offensive language. We do not publish hate speech, libelous material, unsubstantiated allegations or rumors, or personal attacks on individuals or groups.

1 Comment

  1. Allan on September 29, 2012 at 12:10 pm

    I think it makes more sense to provide better local service connecting to BART, rather than a somewhat duplicate service. Of course if BRT were free it certainly would be a plus, but I really don’t think it is best use of our transportation dollars. When I looked at the studies, an alternative integrating with BART was not considered. When I asked a AC Transist director, his answer was that AC customers cannot afford BART. My suggestion is that it would be better to subsidise the less prosperous rather than build an additional system with high operating costa.

Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Photo by Basil D Soufi
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to:

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top