Skip to content

City Council District 1 candidates debate police, gang injunctions and Oakland’s economy

on August 28, 2012

At a candidate’s forum held Monday night at the College Avenue Presbyterian Church, six candidates for the City Council District 1 seat debated how to rebuild a shrinking police force, explored finding a middle ground on the controversial issue of gang injunctions and talked about how the city of Oakland could stimulate sluggish economic growth.

The event was sponsored by the Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, a group that aims to advance economic growth in Oakland, and featured a panel that proposed questions to the candidates. The forum also allowed members of the audience, mostly Oakland residents, to ask their questions through a moderator who took handwritten queries from the approximately 80 people in attendance.

District 1, which represents North Oakland, has been under the leadership of Jane Brunner for the past 20 years, but this year she has decided to give up her seat to run for City Attorney, facing current City Attorney Barbara Parker in the November election.

The seven candidates running to replace her include some names that may ring a bell to Oakland voters, such as Green Party activist Donald Macleay, who unsuccessfully ran for mayor of Oakland back in 2010 and also owns a small computer business.

Other candidates are running for the first time, including Amy Lemley, founder of the First Place Fund for Youth, an organization that provides affordable housing to young adults who have recently “aged out” of foster care; Dan Kalb, an environmental activist and policy analyst; Richard Raya, policy director for California Forward, a nonprofit organization that works to reform California’s government; electrical contractor Don Link who also serves on the Shattuck Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council (NCPC); trial lawyer Craig Brandt; and Len Raphael, a self-employed CPA.

Some of the panelists asked questions about how the candidates would raise the current number of 604 sworn Oakland Police Department officers to 800 officers. Due to layoffs, cutbacks and retirements, the department has seen a dramatic decrease in the number of officers since November, 2008, when the department boasted its highest employment level at 837 officers.

Former Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts was a strong proponent of increasing staffing levels, and some residents believe that the current ratio of police to residents leaves the community unsafe.

“We know that we need money to increase staffing. We tried to pass a parcel tax not very long ago, and it failed,” said Raya, referring to a proposed 2011 tax that would have taxed Oakland homeowners an additional $80 to fund more OPD officers. The move was supported by Oakland Mayor Jean Quan, but voted down by residents.

Brandt said he would support a similar $80 parcel tax, even during what some may consider hard economic times. “It is an emergency situation, and I think we all are taxed up to our eyeballs, we all are having a hard time,” said Brandt. But, he continued, “You are going to spend some money if you are going to want some more police officers.”

Macleay suggested that the OPD could hire civilians to work inside the department in some roles, such as working as investigators. “Not all police do the same things, they don’t have the same roles, and not all the roles need to be filled by badge-carrying officers, gun-carrying officers,” said Macleay.

Candidates also addressed concerns about how Oakland could bring more businesses into the community. “Oakland should get out of the economic development business—it doesn’t understand how private enterprise people decide to make decisions and it usually does it wrong,” Raphael said. “Trying to encourage non-profits and government to come here, that’s dumb. They don’t pay taxes, but they consume services. I would say get out the economic development business—just provide high quality basic services and business will come.”

But Link disagreed. “I support Oakland being active in economic development. If we do it smart, I think we can do it well,” said Link. “We got an an exciting city that’s actually getting a buzz from the New York Times and all over the country.”

The candidates also debated Oakland’s gang injunctions, which restrict the movements of alleged gang members by enforcing curfews and banning identified gang members from interacting with one another. Oakland has two injunctions in place, one against members of the North Side Oakland gang in North Oakland and another against members of the Nortenos gang in the Fruitvale area. Gang injunctions have been controversial among residents because some feel the injunctions target a certain racial group.

“The gang injunction, the curfew, it happens inside the environment where people of color feel very differently about it then somebody who looks like me,” said Macleay. “I am a white middle-class guy, college-educated and have a business. I could be all for a gang injunction, but in the communities this is effecting, we are not promoting trust, we are not prompting dialogue, we are not prompting cooperation.”

Some candidates said that enforcing a gang injunction may not be very effective. “We have one [gang injunction] here in North Oakland, and we’ve had a few people who were arrested…that were members. Two of them were arrested outside of the gang injunction zone and one was arrested within it. None of them were arrested because of the gang injunction. Their arrest was probation or parole violations,” said Brandt. “So the injunction itself is still a question mark with me. I support it, but I don’t think it has produce the results that we were expecting.”

“I am also very skeptical about the value of the so-called gang injunctions,” said Kalb, who added that instead of a gang injunction he would favor increasing funding to conflict resolutions programs in schools. “The data shows that it has very questionable value.”

According to Paul Junge, vice president and public policy director of the Chamber of Commerce, the chamber held this forum, and is planning other community events, to help the citizens get a sense of the candidates running for office. “We try to ask the candidates questions about government budgeting and the priorities they would establish and by holding forums in the communities that they will represent,” said Junge. “We hope the people in those areas can come and hear from the candidates and vote more intelligently.”

Reactions to the panel from audience members were mixed. “It was wonderful, I really appreciate everybody showing up, we need to hear what these people are offering,” said Samsarah Morgan, 52, resident of district 1, who works as a midwife counselor in Oakland. “I was favorably impressed with a couple of people. I think we need to have more forums like this.”

But Oakland resident Randy Menjivar, 24, was disappointed that the panel did not answer his question. “They [the panel] selected what questions they wanted to raise to the candidates to answer. I asked them how were they going to help empower working class people that are affected every day by unemployment,” he said. “They didn’t answer my questions, and of course that is a bias.”

The Chamber of Commerce is expected to hold its next forum on August 28 for Oakland’s District 5 candidates at the Fruitvale-San Antonio Senior Center. For more information visit:


  1. Daniel on August 28, 2012 at 5:48 pm

    Thanks for reporting, but every candidate should get some coverage. As the only woman candidate in the race I want to know more about Amy!

    • Rachel on September 7, 2012 at 9:08 am

      I second Daniel’s comment. I too, was disappointed to not see Amy’s perspectives represented. While I’m not a D1 resident I am very curious about her position on these important issues. A story update would be appreciated!

  2. Donald Macleay on August 28, 2012 at 10:37 pm

    Thanks for this. I feel that this is a fair representation of the event and I feel the quotes of my own views were well chosen.

  3. livegreen on August 29, 2012 at 12:37 pm

    Is the Chamber putting out the Q&A? It would be nice to hear all the questions, or at least the most important and the answers of each candidate. Not all of us could attend and we need to have access to all the candidates answers…Not just Don Macleay’s (no offense Don).

    • Mike Linksvayer on August 29, 2012 at 2:59 pm

      I didn’t attend this one, but I did the LWV/Chamber sponsored one for city attorney, and there was a very reasonable mix of questions from a journalist, a chamber representative, and the audience (collected by LWV people).

    • Mike Linksvayer on August 29, 2012 at 3:01 pm

      I misread your comment.

      I would also like to see the Q&A. Hopefully the debates are recorded and will appear on YouTube et al.

  4. Len Raphael on August 29, 2012 at 7:21 pm

    If you’re going to quote candidates, please be more careful.

    Neither Don Link nor myself speak Ebonics.

    I have written many grammatically opinion pieces for the Tribune, Oakland North, and Oakland Oakland Local explaining the only way to afford more police is to immediately implement a two-tier system for all new city hires that significantly cuts pay and benefits. Then we have to examine the pay and benefits we pay all existing employees to cope with the huge unfunded retirement and infrastructure costs.

    The alternative will be Stockton by the Bay bankruptcy or a city where all services are cut to Blade Runner levels just so we can afford to pay for the retirement costs our officials should never have promised.

    Don Link I believe, is a former college professor.

    I said “Oakland should get out of the economic development business—it doesn’t understand how private enterprise people decide to make decisions and it usually does it wrong,”

    Link said “We’ve got an exciting city that’s actually getting a buzz from the New York Times and all over the country.”

    He did not say “We gotten”

    To illustrate my point that Oakland should get out of economic development, consider our record of loans to bakeries, skating rinks, hotels, tens of millions of bad loans to developers, and a wonderful Fox Theatre with rehab costs that went thru the roof.

    If the Feds aren’t good at picking winners, (google Solyndra), and savvy venture capitalists know that most of their investments will be duds, then the odds are not good that a bunch of City Council members, most of whom have never started their own for-profit business in their lives, let alone worked for a for profit enterprise, could possibly decide which types of business or specif business to encourage.

    The other candidates seem to conflate economic development with planning/zoning of real estate development.

    Real estate development creates construction jobs and supports related industries, but it is different from economic development, even though Jerry Brown mistakenly thought that if you build residential units, that the jobs would automatically come.

    Regulating, encouraging, nudging certain kinds of real estate development via zoning and planning is a proper function of a city to encourage an low carbon footprint, livable city.

    Playing central economic planner is not.
    NPR’s Planet Money had a very good series on the subject.

    Len Raphael, CPA
    Candidate for District 1 City Council

    • Oakland North Staff on August 29, 2012 at 7:32 pm

      Hi Len, we have corrected the two typos in the quotes. Thanks for your response!

    • Harriet on September 3, 2012 at 9:23 am

      Thanks for covering District One. But I find it quite odd that you chose to not give voice to each of the candidates, and especially that you omitted Amy Lemley, one of the most qualified contenders for the position.

      ps- To correct Len’s post: Don Link was not a college professor, but a dropout from a program he started but failed to complete.

  5. Mark on August 31, 2012 at 11:36 am

    To be clear, residents voted against the recent proposals for more taxes for police NOT because we dont want more police. We voted against it because we DO NOT TRUST Jean Quan (the sting from Measure Y is still very fresh)

  6. Derrick Claye on September 1, 2012 at 4:56 pm

    Very good reporting.

  7. Dan Kalb on September 3, 2012 at 7:13 pm

    Thanks for reporting on the candidates forum. I’m thrilled to have prioritized growing our local clean tech economy, reducing crime through hiring more police and investing in programs to reduce recidivism, restoring trust in City Hall, and more. -Dan Kalb

    p.s. readers should be wary of campaign operatives who offer a comment without disclosing their affiliation.

Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Photo by Basil D Soufi
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to:

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top