Skip to content

Voters will decide on Measure B1 this election, which would boost transportation funding in Alameda County

If approved, Measure B1 could raise billions for transportation

on October 19, 2012

Nearly $8 billion over the next three decades could flow to Alameda County roads, sidewalks, highways, buses and trains, if voters approve Measure B1 on November 6. The measure would double the existing half-cent sales tax for transportation to one cent. Measure B1 requires approval from two-thirds of voters to take effect.

Within Measure B1 are several ambitious projects that bear directly on Oakland. Projects to repair major thoroughfares, including High Street, Park Street, East 14th Street, and the Fruitvale Bridge, would receive some of the projected $1.5 billion for local streets over the next 30 years. Several Interstate 880 interchanges would see improvements to relieve congestion and increase safety.

Across the county, transit programs for seniors, students, and people with disabilities would receive a projected $789 million. Around $264 million is also set aside for bike trails, including a new East Bay Greenway stretching from East Oakland to Fremont.

Most significantly, AC Transit would receive roughly $1.8 billion over three decades. That figure includes a projected $1.45 billion for “operations, maintenance, and safety,” and nearly $350 million for the East Bay Paratransit program, which provides van transportation for people who are unable to use AC Transit and BART.  $35 million would be directed towards four Bus Rapid Transit routes, each of which would pass through Oakland.

“These are very dire times for transportation funding,” said Clarence Johnson, spokesman for AC Transit. Johnson said that it would be “a little premature” to discuss exactly how money from Measure B1 would be spent. But he said he expects the funds would go to restoring service, maintenance, and bus rapid transit lines. Johnson said that Measure B1 would be a “tremendous boon” for the East Bay’s bus service.

Across Alameda County, about 48% of Measure B1 funds would be spent on transit, 39% would be spent on roads and highways, and 8% would go toward bicycle and pedestrian programs.  Measure B1 funds would be managed by a 22-member commission, which includes a representative from each city in the county, and two from Oakland.

Measure B1’s dollar figures are all based on projections.  The figures could wind up millions off the mark if economic or population growth falls short of expectations. Planners predict Alameda County’s current population will grow 24% by 2035, to about 1.9 million. The projected dollar amounts are all calculated as a percentage of Measure B1 revenue over the next 30 years, and will rise or fall with spending in Alameda County.

Jonathan Bair, President of the Board of Walk Oakland Bike Oakland, says that if Measure B passes “we’ll see safer and better maintained streets, more bike lanes and more sidewalk repair, more repair of our unique urban pathways and stairways, and we’ll see much improved transit service.” Bair says he’s encouraged by a doubling of funding for bicycle and pedestrian programs, which he says would assist Oakland in implementing its Bicycle Master Plan.

Bair says that Measure B1 funds could help restore local roads, which benefit drivers, but also transit riders, pedestrians and bicyclists.

Opponents are calling Measure B expensive and wasteful. “When times are tight, you tighten your belt,” said Mimi Steel, President of the SF Bay Citizens Alliance for Property Rights. “Before anybody talks about spending any money, or putting any more taxes on hardworking people, they need to take a hard look at what resources they have right now.” Steel says she often sees empty buses near her Castro Valley home.

Chris Pareja, a former U.S. Congressional Candidate from Hayward, says Measure B “has the potential to make Alameda County less business-friendly and less competitive, especially for small retailers.” Pareja, who co-wrote the argument against Measure B1 on Alameda County sample ballots, says he’s concerned about a section in Measure B1 that allows the county to take out $1 billion in bonds without additional voter approval. “What we don’t want to do is put Alameda County in more debt, especially for infrastructure that may not be necessary,” Pareja said.

Unlike past transportation taxes in Alameda County, Measure B1 contains no sunset clause.  So, if approved, it would not expire, unless voters passed another measure voiding it.  Planners would put forward updates to voters every twenty years, starting in 2042. An independent watchdog committee would prepare a report on Measure B1 spending each year, if passed.

A provision in the measure specifies that neither the state nor other governments may appropriate Measure B1 funds, and that all proceeds must be applied to transportation projects benefitting Alameda County. Critics contend that these funds might nevertheless be used for projects that extend outside the county, though the projects set forth in the Measure are fully or largely inside Alameda County’s limits.

Measure B1’s advocates acknowledge that “a two-thirds vote is always a heavy lift,” as Bair says. There have been no polls on the measure, which sits alongside six other tax and bond measures on Oakland voters’ ballots. It has been endorsed by each of Alameda County’s fourteen cities, including Oakland, Berkeley, Fremont, and Emeryville. Transit agencies, including AC Transit and BART, transit advocates, and unions have also thrown their support behind B1.

Alameda County’s current sales tax for transportation—one half cent per every dollar—was initially approved by voters in 1986, and reauthorized by over 80% of voters in 2000. It is not set to expire until 2022. If Measure B1 doesn’t garner two-thirds of votes in favor, then the half-cent sales tax will remain in place.

Click the audio player below to hear Oakland residents talk about their stances on Measure B1.


  1. Robert Prinz on October 20, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    Thanks for this well researched and insightful article. Oakland has learned the hard way that letting the pavement condition get out of control via a lack of funding for maintenance costs much, much more in the long run to fix. To see the city’s 5-year paving plan both with and without Measure B1 money, check out this link. It’s a pretty stark difference:

    Since Measure B1 is local money not dependent on a fickle state or federal government, this means we would have a guaranteed resource for keeping our streets and roads safe and smooth, which would actually SAVE us lots of money over time. Do the smart thing for convenience, safety, the economy, and the quality of life here in Oakland, and vote “yes” on Measure B1.

  2. Today’s Headlines | Streetsblog San Francisco on October 22, 2012 at 8:59 am

    […] Oakland North Interviews Supporters, Opponents of Alameda County’s $8B Transpo Measure B1 […]

  3. […] Measure B1 would generate a projected $7.8 billion over the next 30 years for projects selected using a “complete streets” approach aimed at improving the county’s streets, trails, and transit infrastructure to accommodate all modes of transportation. The measure would double the county’s existing half-cent transportation sales tax, with 48 percent of the revenue devoted to improving transit, 8 percent to bicycle and pedestrian projects, and 39 percent to roads and highways. If approved, it would represent an unprecedented commitment to non-motorized transportation. […]

  4. Vish on November 16, 2012 at 2:18 pm

    The major problem with this measure is that the biggest share of the pie goes to AC Transit and other mass transit operators. Most people who live in the suburbs (outside of Oakland and Berkeley) will be providing the bulk of the revenue for this measure, and not get much in return. AC Transit busses run almost empty in Fremont, and it is a criminal waste of money to add funding to them. I am all for fixing the deplorable condition of roads in Alameda county, but they should use the existing funds to do that. Our neighboring counties of Contra Costa and Santa Clara have lower sales tax and better roads – we need to learn from them.

  5. […] Measure B1 Could Raise Billions For Transportation […]

Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Photo by Basil D Soufi
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to:

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top