You Tell Us: Vote yes on Measure A1
on November 2, 2012
It’s one thing to debate the issues and quite another to spread misinformation or outright lies about current ballot initiatives. Whatever your opinion of Measure A1, (and I hope everyone votes YES!), we need to hold people accountable to the truth.
The Oakland Zoo is a community-benefit, non-profit institution that is owned by the City of Oakland. We have been in the community since 1922. The zoo and City of Oakland renewed its management agreement, in place since the 1980s, for the next 30 years, never before done by the city and demonstrating the value of the zoo to the community. The zoo always has carefully managed both private and public funds and is proud to have the highest rating on Charity Navigator, an independent charity evaluating organization.
The Oakland Zoo is one of the most respected in the country. As anyone who has spent time at the zoo knows, we are not a “theme park,” as some have suggested. We have earned the respect of many animal welfare groups, including PETA, the Humane Society, and In Defense of Animals for our unapologetic commitment to the welfare of animals.
If you read the Measure A1 Expenditure Plan, you will see that, by law, the money must be used for animal care, children’s educational programs and maintaining the zoo’s affordability. It does specify that money would go towards upgrading animal enclosures and repairing animal shelters – but this “construction” is a far cry from using the funds to expand the zoo. The real truth here is that a local chapter of California Native Plant Society and local neighbors have tried to stop progress.
From 2008-2011, the Oakland Zoo engaged in a public, democratic process with a more than 1,000-page environmental document to review the California Project. CNPS and neighbors challenged it every step of the way and lost. They even challenged it in court and lost, wasting money that could have been spent on animal care and children’s education programs. Still not satisfied with the democratic and legal processes of our society, they have now chosen to take a stand against Measure A1.
Measure A1 is not a referendum on an approved project that is moving forward. Measure A1 is about critically needed animal care, maintaining and expanding essential education programs, and ensuring the zoo stays affordable to all levels of society. Measure A1 funds will be closely monitored by an independent oversight committee comprised of nine members, appointed by five different agencies, and representing six stakeholder groups, including the League of Women Voters. The zoo appoints two of the nine members and your publicly-elected Board of Supervisors, with accountability from the Oversight Committee, have ultimate authority to ensure funds are spent according to the Expenditure Plan (Section 2.30.050E of Ordinance).
The tax of $1/month cannot be changed by the zoo, the City of Oakland, or even the Board of Supervisors. Only you, the voters, can elect to change it.
Don’t just take our word and commitment. Listen to science and environmental education teachers; veterinarians; environmental and conservation organizations (East Bay Regional Park District, Bay Area Puma Project, Ventana Wildlife Society, and Wildlife Conservation Network), progressive Democrats (Congresswoman Barbara Lee, State Senator Loni Hancock, Alameda Democratic Party, East Bay Young Democrats, Wellstone Democratic Renewal Club) and leading newspapers (San Francisco Chronicle and San Francisco Bay Guardian), all of whom support the Oakland Zoo and planning for its healthy future via Measure A1.
Nik Dehejia is the director of strategic initiatives for the East Bay Zoological Society, which operates and manages the Oakland Zoo.
You can read a You Tell Us op-ed against Measure A1 here.
You Tell Us is Oakland North’s community Op-Ed page, featuring opinion pieces submitted by readers on Oakland-related topics. Have something to say? Send essays of 500-1,000 words to firstname.lastname@example.org. We’d love to hear from you!
All essays reflect the opinions of their authors, and not of the Oakland North staff or the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism. Oakland North reserves the right to edit submissions for length, clarity and spelling/grammar. Oakland North does not pay for the the publication of opinion pieces. You Tell Us submissions must be written in civil and non-offensive language. We do not publish hate speech, libelous material, unsubstantiated allegations or rumors, or personal attacks on individuals or groups.
Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to: email@example.com.