You Tell Us: Oakland voters should reject Measure Z
on October 30, 2014
Ten years ago, the city claimed it was broke, and that there was a public safety safety crisis. They asked voters to approve a “temporary” parcel tax that would last 10 years to lower crime. Sound familiar? After 10 years of the failed Measure Y, the public safety crisis is obviously far worse. This alone is sufficient reason not to support Measure Z, the proposed successor. We can see that simply throwing money at a problem will not make it go away. But the story gets worse. Measure Y, unlike the proposed Measure Z, was not supposed to just throw money at the problem. Specific promises were made. Measure Y promised baseline staffing of 739 officers as a precondition of collecting the tax, and the money for police was supposed to go largely for dedicated “problem solving officers,” one for each beat. It promised full staffing of the police department at 803 officers. It promised annual audits required by law. It promised meaningful oversight and evaluations. It promised that the money would only be used for designated purposes. Over the last 10 years, the City has continually and repeatedly violated those promises.
For years after Measure Y passed, police staffing went down, rather than up. The city failed to fill the community policing positions. Even when they were filled, officers were repeatedly pulled off their beats to deal with issues elsewhere in the city, sometimes for months at a time. The city spent over $8 million of Measure Y funds for unauthorized purposes, resulting in a lawsuit. It never performed the mandatory audits until I prevailed in my lawsuit, and the city was then forced to do them. The oversight committee failed to address, or even notice, the ongoing and repeated violations.
After briefly achieving a police force of the promised 803 officers, the city promptly laid off 80 officers, and the force declined steadily, eventually to a low of 611. Crime, meanwhile, has skyrocketed. This is not a track record that the city can afford to repeat.
Unfortunately, Measure Z is far worse than the original Measure Y. It costs more, and delivers nothing. It doesn’t promise a single additional police officer. The “baseline staffing” for police referred to (678) is deceptive, and contains exceptions big enough to drive a truck through. Moreover, most policing experts agree Oakland needs closer to 900-1000 officers. Why should Oakland residents, who already pay amongst the highest taxes in the state, be asked to pay extra for far below basic services? Measure Z also eliminates the previously guaranteed problem solving officers, sounding a death knell for real community policing.
As usual, city officials are using threats to coerce voters into approving this misguided measure. They claim that without Measure Z, the funds will be lost, and staffing could go down even more. But voters have a choice and can demand that city officials come back next year with a new proposal that doesn’t cost more, will truly be temporary, and contains guaranteed increases in police staffing that will make a real difference in public safety. Voters should not be asked to reward financial mismanagement and broken promises, or settle for a measure that doesn’t do nearly enough to make meaningful improvements to public safety.
Marleen Sacks has lived in Oakland for 15 years, and is an attorney and public safety advocate who twice sued the City of Oakland over repeated violations of Measure Y.
You Tell Us is Oakland North’s community Op-Ed page, featuring opinion pieces submitted by readers on Oakland-related topics. Have something to say? Send essays of 500-1,000 words to email@example.com. We’d love to hear from you!
All essays reflect the opinions of their authors, and not of the Oakland North staff or the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism. Oakland North reserves the right to edit submissions for length, clarity and spelling/grammar. Oakland North does not pay for the the publication of opinion pieces. You Tell Us submissions must be written in civil and non-offensive language. We do not publish hate speech, libelous material, unsubstantiated allegations or rumors, or personal attacks on individuals or groups.
Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.
Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to: firstname.lastname@example.org.