Skip to content

Parking wars back on tonight’s council agenda

on October 6, 2009

Fireworks are expected at tonight’s Oakland City Council meeting, as the explosive debate about rolling back parking meter hours returns to City Hall.

The council will hear at least two proposals at this evening’s 6:00 meeting—one to roll the meter hours back from 8:00 pm to 6:00 pm, and another to roll them back to 7:00 pm. At the request of the council, city staff will also report on how to recoup the revenue lost by shortening the meter hours.

This lost revenue was the sticking point for the three councilmembers—Nancy Nadel, Desley Brooks and Rebecca Kaplan—who abstained from voting for the rollback at the last city council meeting. These abstentions, coupled with the absence of Councilmember Ignacio De La Fuente, sent the proposal back to the drawing board. De La Fuente, whose vote might have changed the outcome, did not return repeated phone calls requesting comment as to why he did not attend the meeting.

“I am hoping that we can find common ground,” said Carl Chan, of the Oakland Chinatown Chamber Foundation, who organized Chinatown businesses and made a number of suggestions for the rollback proposal. “We will be there tomorrow and we are hoping we will get the vote we need pass the rollback to six pm.”

But some Oakland merchants say reducing meter hours is not enough.

“Rolling back to six pm is just a band-aid solution,” said Grand Lake Theater Manager Allen Michaan, one of the most vocal opponents of the city’s recent parking cost increases. “That is not to going to solve the problems and make this go away.”

The Grand Lake’s marquee last week read, “Shame on the City Council for the Damage their Parking Racket is Inflicting in Oakland. Recall?”  Michaan also led a small meeting to explore how to begin recall proceedings against Councilmembers Nadel, Brooks, Kaplan and De La Fuente.

Like Chan, Michaan said the increased parking enforcement is taking a big toll on Oakland businesses. Since the city increased meter hours and fines for certain parking violations in July, along with stepping up  enforcement,  Michaan says the Grand Lake’s business has dropped by 50 percent.

“The recession is of course part of it,” he said. “A lot of people were on the edge, and then this comes along and pushes them over the edge.”

Council members said they’ve been hearing plenty from constituents in their districts. “We have merchants and small businesses telling us that they need relief, and we are trying to provide that to them,” said Andre Jones, chief of staff to Councilmember Rebecca Kaplan. “But there are a lot of moving parts and these are complicated numbers.”

In addition to the two proposals on the agenda Tuesday, sources close to the council said some members were working on their own suggestions. It is likely that some may go further than rolling back the meter hours, but this raises new questions about funding. “What I would really like is that we do a comprehensive study of what parking controls would be best for what parts of the city and why,” Councilmember Nadel said via email. “I think my colleagues will have the votes to rescind the restrictions and will make an attempt to ask for a study, but with no idea how to pay for it.”

At the last meeting, the council did request a quick-turnaround report on parking—due to be completed 45 days later. But it is unclear how substantive this report will be. A call to Noel Pinto in the Parking Enforcement Department regarding the report was not returned.

In the meantime, sources close to the council say  unofficial conversations are taking place to tell parking enforcement to “tread a little softer.”


  1. A on October 6, 2009 at 8:48 am

    How about this — roll the parking situation back to what it was, and then when Michaan doesn’t immediately start making money again, City Hall can say We Told You So, Now Shut Up and put the hours back to 8 pm.

  2. Rodney Thomas on October 6, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    A, I am sorry, you just don’t get it. What makes you think that people are going to start coming back “immediately” to Oakland after all this bad press? I don’t live in Oakland. Do you think I want to pay this parking “tax” by getting tripped up by aggressive enforcement?

    Also, has A asked how the Oakland parking tax affects chains versus local, independent businesses? The chains aren’t affected at all, they have free, off-street parking. This is a punitive tax on small business. If the city wants income why don’t they put a parking tax on each individual off-street parking space? They won’t of course because we could never extort from a corporate chain–they’d come down on the city council just like that. No, extortion by the city only gets applied to small businesses.

  3. R on October 8, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    Okay. Today I came home for my lunch hour and was shocked and felt extremely violated to see a parking ticket on my windshield. Do you know why? Because I know that they will reject anything I have to say about not being parked there for 2 hours. Even if I had proof. I can send in my timecard to the parking department and they will reject it. I want to cry and punch everyone in the face. And the cost of this ticket? $70.

    City of Oakland is making people starve. I hate this city.

  4. R on October 8, 2009 at 6:14 pm

    This Saturday I will park my car near the same place I was today, and I will video tape my car from the outside and see how many times a meter fairy maid passes by to mark the cars or to see if they just wing it and say F* it I’m going to put a ticket there anyway. I know they do that, I know they did that for my car today and I want to video tape proof.

  5. Oakland IsThePits on October 9, 2009 at 6:26 pm

    The meter maids are getting slick. Since Oakland is hurting for money and people are complaining about the new hours, they are ticketing more than ever for whatever violations they can find. I paid the meter more than enough money only to find my car with a ticket for a compliance issue, not a parking violation. I’m quitting my volunteer work (cleaning Oaklnd parks since they can’t afford it) to protest this. I don’t care if Oakland gets dirty or loses value anymore. I’m moving out as soon as I can so some gangbanger can move into my current residence since that’s all this city deserves. Oakland you are losing your good and productive citizens over your crooked practices.

Oakland North welcomes comments from our readers, but we ask users to keep all discussion civil and on-topic. Comments post automatically without review from our staff, but we reserve the right to delete material that is libelous, a personal attack, or spam. We request that commenters consistently use the same login name. Comments from the same user posted under multiple aliases may be deleted. Oakland North assumes no liability for comments posted to the site and no endorsement is implied; commenters are solely responsible for their own content.

Photo by Basil D Soufi
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to:

Latest Posts

Scroll To Top