bottles of water

Talk of banning soda from food stamp benefits elicits upset and uncertainty

on October 9, 2013

Restricting food stamp users from buying soda with their benefits is an idea sparking debate in Oakland, where City Hall officials, food policy advocates and food stamp users are far from consensus on whether a ban would hurt or help the city’s poor.

The dispute was reignited in June when Mayor Jean Quan joined 17 other mayors across the country in signing a letter to Congress expressing support of a potential ban on buying soda from CalFresh, the state’s food stamp program. The letter was addressed to Speaker John Boehner and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.

“… This generation of American children is the first to face the possibility of a shorter life expectancy than their parents,” the mayors wrote.  “It is time to test and evaluate approaches limiting SNAP’s subsidization of products, such as sugar-sweetened beverages, that are contributing to obesity.” (SNAP, or the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, is the name of the federal government’s food benefit program.)

But since the federal government regulates the food stamp program, cities don’t have the power to impose a ban. Cities can only pressure federal government officials through such letters and lobbying efforts, to restrict food stamp benefits.

The Alameda County Public Health Department has supported a “Soda Free Summer” campaign for six years, but officials at the forum said they have not taken any position on a proposed ban on purchases with food stamps.  For its part, the American Beverage Association, a trade group, has repeatedly challenged studies that suggest a correlation between soda consumption and obesity and diabetes.

At the Brookins AME Church in East Oakland, food stamp recipients and advocates passionately spoke out against a potential ban on soda at a recent forum sponsored by a food advocacy nonprofit.

“I take offense at the idea that someone else knows what’s best for me,” said Starla Gay, who enrolls people in CalFresh at the Alameda County Social Services Agency.  “I was once a poor person, I used to be on food stamps. I don’t need a politician to make assumptions about me and enforce their thoughts of what’s best for me.”

Other speakers at the late-September forum said that a soda ban could lead to more restrictive prohibitions in the future, and worried that placing restrictions on food stamps could deter people in need from enrolling in CalFresh.

One early supporter of a soda ban said that the views expressed at the forum changed her perspective.

“I myself have been staunchly in support of not being able to purchase sodas and sugary beverages with the EBT (food stamp) card,” said Kelly Carlisle,  a CalFresh recipient who heads Acta Non Verba, an urban farming organization for school kids in East Oakland.

“I learned from that meeting different perspectives,” Carlisle said.

“It’s true that when things start getting taken away, … it doesn’t stop at just one thing. I think that it’s probably not the government’s job to tell people what they should or should not eat,” she said.

The Oakland Food Policy Council, a central platform for food advocacy, co-sponsored the forum in East Oakland to gather public comment about the potential ban. Council director Esperanza Pallana said the council has not taken an official stance on a soda ban, but she was surprised by the strength of opposition.

“I genuinely had no idea what the opinion was going to be,” Pallana said. “But there’s this implication felt by the beneficiaries of these programs that they’re not making the right choices when they feel the opposite. They have to be very careful about what they’re buying. For somebody in a difficult situation, they don’t want to be treated like a child.”

5 Comments

  1. EAT REAL FOOD on October 9, 2013 at 2:54 pm

    Compared to America as a whole, poor people already consume a disproportionate amount of hyper-processed, sugar-laden, preservative-ridden non-food. This makes them more likely to develop health problems, which makes it harder for them to maintain employment, which leads them to continue to need SNAP benefits.

    But the N in “SNAP” stands for “nutrition.”
    There is no nutrition in soda.
    Therefore SNAP shouldn’t pay for soda.
    …or hot Cheetos, or takis, or any breakfast cereal with over some predetermined percentage of sugar, or pre-made cake, or ice cream.

    Why the hell should we pay to give someone diabetes and then pay to treat their diabetes?

    A decent society recognizes that everyone has the right to eat. But we don’t have to give everyone the right to eat crap.



  2. EAT REAL FOOD on October 9, 2013 at 2:58 pm

    There is one reason that the opposition to a soda ban is so high: there is a huge number of people on SNAP benefits who are addicted to high fructose corn syrup and who’s children are addicted to high fructose corn syrup.

    I have no problems with a so-called “Nanny State”. We should take care of people. But no self-respecting nanny would feed her clients high fructose corn syrup. It’s poison.



  3. joe smith on October 9, 2013 at 6:13 pm

    Refined sugar is bad for you and your children, but IMO nutritional food is not readily available in Oakland.
    There is is too much Fat, Salt, Sugar, on the shelves of Oakland grocery stores.



    • grocery stores on October 14, 2013 at 10:36 pm

      Oakland grocery stores? what grocery stores? The poorest neighborhoods have little to no access to true grocery stores, and are forced to buy food at corner stores and fast food because that’s all that’s available. This is an over simplified answer to a complex problem.



  4. Kris on January 24, 2014 at 11:43 pm

    Soda is food, it should not be restricted, period.

    The whole diet and nutritious foods is a myth, as well as comparison to WIC.

    If we ban soda, should we ban sugar and honey? Have human beings eaten sugar and honey for thousands of years? Yes,

    If your in the middle of the wilderness, will you survive longer if you consumer both water and sugar/honey, yes?

    Does white bread turn into glucose, yes.
    Does the body need glucose to survice, yes (although the body can break down proteins).

    So why is soda “junk food”, its not its food, the problem is excess of it combined with physical activity.

    All food can be junk depending on quantity. WIC, contrary to what the public believes is not about nutritious foods, its about the right size, right amount, children have different nutritional needs.

    The problem with SNAP is actually complex, it assumes most americans have a certain lifestyle and a nutritional profile, that is either your sedentary half the day or a quarter of the day.

    SNAP is based on the thrifty food plan, men need more calories on average then woman, however SNAP does not given women less food stamp money, it instead bases the 18-50 or so tfp for men, and gives it to everyone.

    If we are going to talk about nutrition, to be fair we would have to give less food stamps to women and more to men and less to older people.

    Also, fruit juice and milk although have nutrition, its laden with sugar especially juice since its concentrated, and white bread is worse than pizza? It’s a slippery slope.



Photo by Basil D Soufi
logo
Oakland North

Oakland North is an online news service produced by students at the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism and covering Oakland, California. Our goals are to improve local coverage, innovate with digital media, and listen to you–about the issues that concern you and the reporting you’d like to see in your community. Please send news tips to: oaklandnorthstaff@gmail.com.

Latest Posts